Post Scriptum. The focus is on the arbitration of the 6rd round of the Ukrainian Premier League

FFU Arbiters Committee Commented on Arbitrators' Decisions During Round 6 Matches of the Ukrainian Premier League

6 round

24.08.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX, Olympic-Shakhtar match

44 min Protests for the appointment of 11U through GR are unfounded. The ball falls into the hands of the defender of "Olympic" unexpectedly and accidentally after a sudden and powerful rebound. The defender does not have time to react in a deliberate way. In addition, the arm is not exposed from the torso, but, on the contrary, is parallel to the body. The referee correctly continued the game and assigned only a corner kick in favor of Shakhtar.

56 min Protests for the appointment of 11U because of the alleged GR are unfounded. The Shakhtar № 44 player does not commit a deliberate GR because the ball hits between the torso (pelvis) and the arm, and the player does not commit any intentional actions to prevent the ball from flying. The game was resumed correctly with the subsequent appointment of Shakhtar in favor of Shakhtar for an obvious push by Shakhtar defender Olimpik.

68 min The referee demonstrated the management of technical and disciplinary sanctions that did not correspond to the game episode. № 41 Olimpica commits an obvious violation against № 27 Shakhtar, detaining him by the neck. The game should have been stopped immediately by assigning SHU, not applying the principle of superiority. This is followed by an episode from Shakhtar's №10, who, in an attempt to free himself from № 41's custody, commits a violation by illegally using his hands, which is not permitted by the Rules and which deserves a warning from the referee.

25.08.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX, match "Alexandria" - "Vorskla"

5 min The player of № 6 "Alexandria" enters the penalty area, where he is met by № 11 "Vorskla", which in an attempt to play the ball touches the opponent in an imperceptible way. № 6 "Alexandria" spreads her legs in a typical simulation manner and falls on the lawn in a clearly theatrical manner. In such a situation, you can not just continue the game, but it was necessary to issue a warning to the player (LCD).

35 min № 44 "Alexandria" directs the ball to the opponent's goal, and № 14 "Vorskla" interrupts the trajectory of the ball, instinctively, but deliberately, tearing his hand from the body. Due to the fact that the hand is in an unnatural position (detached from the body), it creates an obstacle, and for this in favor of "Alexandria" was to be assigned 11U. The decision to continue the game, considering the actions unintentional, is wrong. AA № 1 could help the referee.

25.08.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX, Chornomorets - Dynamo match

49 min Player № 7 Dynamo performs two dribbling movements on the border with the opponent's penalty area. He manages to resist, then commits the first violation № 5 "Chornomorets", he continues to move because of the obvious advantage, and then № 11 "Chornomorets" makes him a step, touching in the obvious manner of his left foot. The violation was committed outside the penalty area, and the player № 7 "Dynamo" falls inside the penalty area. The referee had to stop the game and appoint SHU in favor of Dynamo, as well as render ZhK № 11 Chornomorets for an obvious failure of a promising attack.

26.08.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX, match "Mariupol" - "Lviv"

5 min 11U was correctly assigned to Lviv. The player of № 23 "Mariupol", not intending to play the ball, is released from the opponent, № 2 "Lviv", by a strong push, which led to his fall on the lawn. In vain violation, given the location of players on the field, but it deserved a penalty 11U.

90 + 2 min. № 86 Mariupol was correctly warned that he was getting rid of his opponent by using his hands illegally. The situation is behind the referee, but thanks to good interaction and teamwork AA № 1 informs him of what happened.

90 + 4 min. The decision to issue the Cheka № 25 "Mariupol" is correct. At 53 minutes № 25 Mariupol disrupts a promising attack № 5 Lviv. The referee allows the game to continue, using an obvious advantage, but upon completion of the action he issues a warning (LCD), which is mandatory for № 25 "Mariupol". At 94 minutes the same player of "Mariupol" plays high with his foot in front of the opponent, Льво 43 "Lviv", and thus he poses a danger to his health. The decision to date the Cheka through the receipt of two LCDs is correct.

August 26.08.2018, XNUMX, match between Karpaty and Arsenal

24 min The arbitrator correctly determined the place of the violation, namely outside the penalty area. Only SHU was correctly appointed, not 11U in favor of Arsenal. № 94 Karpaty committed a foul from behind against № 7 Arsenal, which carried out a promising attack, and therefore ZhK № 94 Karpaty was also ruled correctly.

51 min 11U was correctly assigned to the Carpathians. № 35 "Karpaty" passes due to dribbling № 74 "Arsenal" and enters the penalty area. He is detained behind № 74 by Arsenal, which disrupts a promising attack in an attempt to stop the opponent's advance. 11U was correctly assigned to Karpaty and the Arsenal LCD 74 was taken out.

84 min № 24 Arsenal was correctly rendered by the Cheka. Just before that, he collided with the № 10 Carpathians, and his behavior was inconsistent with the Rules - he touched the head of the № 10 Carpathians in a derogatory manner. Eventually, he encounters this player again and demonstrates the same behavior - he commits aggressive behavior with his head, striking. From the point of view of the criteria for assessing aggressive behavior, at the level of the Rules, attempting to strike or strike is the same, and therefore the applied interpretation of the Rules is correct.

August 26.08.2018, XNUMX, match between Zorya and Desna

40 min Protests for the appointment of 11U through the Desna defender's GR are unfounded. № 6 "Zori" directs the ball to the goal, and it hits the body and partially the arm, which is located along the body. At the same time, the behavior of the Desna player clearly demonstrates that he does not want to hit the ball. The game was properly continued and no 11U was assigned.

Notes:

11U - 11-meter kick

AA - Assistant Arbitrator

VU - Free Kick

GR - Hand Game

LCD - Yellow Card

ZOGM - Failure of Obvious Goal Opportunity

PA - Promising Attack

SIP - Serious Game Violation

Cheka - Red Card

SHU - Free Kick

TOPIC NEWS
28.07.2022 17:00

IFAB Circular on Law 11 - Offside: Clarification of guidance on distinguishing between ricochet and deliberate play

The Committee of Referees of the Ukrainian Football Association draws attention to the fact that ...

04.07.2022 16:00

Rules of the game IFAB-2022/2023 in Ukrainian — on the page of the UAF Referee Committee

The Committee of Referees of the Ukrainian Football Association draws attention to the fact that ...

14.04.2022 09:00

Ukrainian referee to work on Shakhtar's charity match

At today's charity friendly match "Lechia" ...

12.04.2022 15:07

IFAB Circular on changes and additions to the Rules of the game in 2022/2023

March 25 this year in Zurich (Switzerland) was 136 ...

Subscribe to news